Getting Better at NL100 and Beaing raped at NL200

The first part of May has been at least very weird. I am getting excellent results at NL100 but I've failed two times moving up to NL200. My moving up strategy was based primary in playing as much as i can at NL200 and moving down if i lost 3BI. After two failed attempts I have kept playing NL100 hoping to moving up soon and never go back. Even i was very unlucky at NL200 i realized that i was playing scared of money so i've changed my basic strategy from 3BI to 6BI.

Let's talk about NL100 results.



Before talking about the graph above. I'd like to introduce my new poker stats ofr NL100 :P...
TAG style: 19/16/4.6
ATS: 29
WTS=25%
WSD=56%
WonWSF= 38%

Let's compare these stats with my last month's stats:



There are some important stuffs you can deduct from the PokerEV graph:

- I am running hot ( you dont need to remind me that)
-The total winnings line (TWL) is considerably lower than the Showdown winnings line (SWL). Well even i am far away from getting the SWL over the TWL from the Poker EV graph can be deducted that the major difference of these lines can be explained from 1,2K hands equivalent to one session - one monkey tilt session . So why did lose so much of what i'll call 'No showdown value' (NSV) on that session?

After some research